Skip to main content

Q-11 | Paper 2

 Qn 11. What is the difference between interest groups and pressure groups? (2015/II/Q.1c/10m)



Interest groups and pressure groups are both actors of groups politics - they are organised efforts aspiring for a particular cause. Although sometimes considered similar, there are debated and slight differences between the two entities.

Interest groups are organisations seeking to advance a particular interest, concern or cause, while usually not seeking to form a government or part thereof. They rely on a variety of campaigning and lobbying methods to exert influence on government policy. It is often used synonymously with pressure groups, organised groups and catalytic groups. Other scholarly labels include ‘anonymous empire’ (S. E. Finer), ‘invisible government’ (D. D. McKean) and ‘unofficial government’ (T. Sellin and R. D. Lambert).

On the other hand, Pressure groups are non-profit and (usually) voluntary organisations whose members have a common cause, for which they seek to influence political or corporate decision-makers to achieve a declared objective. According to Blondel, they are studied for the “extent to which they enter the political process”.

Differences between interest groups and pressure groups, though contested, minimal and vague, can be pointed out as:

  1. Nature: Interest groups are protective while pressure groups are both protective and promotive.
  2. Structure: Interest groups are formally organised, while pressure groups are more strictly structured.
  3. Orientation: Interest groups are interest-oriented, while pressure groups are focussed on pressure tactics.
  4. Outlook: Interest groups are softer in outlook while pressure groups tend to be harsher in attitude.
  5. Output: Interest groups may or may not influence the governmental action. On the other hand, pressure groups are comparatively more successful in influencing policies.
  6. Classification: Interest groups are classified into communal, institutional and associational groups. Pressure groups are classified into associational, non-associational, institutional and anomic groups.
  7. Usage: The term ‘interest group’ is used in the U.S. and elsewhere to describe all organised groups. In the U.K., ‘interest group’ is used only for those that forward interests of their members and ‘pressure group’ is used to broadly describe organised groups.
  8. Connotation: Interest groups are varyingly judged. But pressure groups sometimes attract disapproval due to their group concern or methods employed, i.e. it is a relatively negatively perceived. JD Reynand, distinguishing between them, said: “when the interest groups act at the political level, they are called pressure groups”.

Interest and pressure groups are manifestations of group action. These groups play an instrumental role in governments accruing legitimacy. They are often used synonymously, so it remains difficult to make dichotomous distinctions between the two.

Popular Posts

Updates on Telegram Channel

Hello aspirants, It's been a while when I posted here on this blog. However, that doesn't mean that I kept you guys aloof from the updates. Those who have joined the telegram channel  have been enjoying all the worthy updates on a frequent intervals. I want you guys also to join the channel in the case you haven't. These days, I've become a bit lethargy to login in to the blog and post the updates while Telegram Channel is quite handy for me to share all the essential materials and 'articles' on the daily basis. Thank you. All the Best.

Japan’s SCRI

  Japan’s Supply Chain Resilience Initiative (SCRI) With COVID-19 and trade tensions between China and the United States threatening supply chains or actually causing bottlenecks, Japan has mooted the Supply Chain Resilience Initiative (SCRI) as a trilateral approach to trade, with India and Australia as the other two partners. The initiative is at the strategy stage and has some way to go before participants can realise trade benefits. What does supply chain resilience mean? In the context of international trade, supply chain resilience is an approach that helps a country to ensure that it has diversified its supply risk across a clutch of supplying nations instead of being dependent on just one or a few. Unanticipated events — whether natural, such as volcanic eruptions, tsunamis, earthquakes or even a pandemic; or manmade, such as an armed conflict in a region — that disrupt supplies from a particular country or even intentional halts to trade, could adversely impact economic activi